When I studied in Lima, my favorite class was 'The History of the
Church in Latin America and Peru.' It was taught by Fr. Jeffrey
Klaiber, S.J. Among the many topics covered were Messianic Movements,
and we looked at Túpac Amaru's rebellion in that context. It would
be a disservice to my late professor's memory to neglect the
religious aspect of Túpac Amaru II's rebellion when discussing him
here.
You may have been wondering (but probably weren't) how it was that a
man claiming to be the Inca lead an army right through Andahuaylillas
and yet there is still a overwhelmingly ornate church here. It's
because Túpac expressly forbid the killing of priests and the
destruction of churches. This was despite the fact that the official
church opposed him. Yet many priests sympathized with his cause of
protecting indigenous people from the crown's abuses.
For his part, Túpac Amaru never publicly condoned or repudiated the
Catholic Church. But he did use Christrian as well as Andean symbols
in his movement. Professor Klaiber taught that it was most likely
that Túpac Amaru used Incan and Christian symbols in his campaign
primarily to attract followers to his cause. The Spanish, and in
particular the Jesuits, had been around long enough to attract many
of the indigenous people to Christian beliefs.
In class we ended up defining the Great Rebellion as a
“quasi-messianic” movement. Túpac Amaru comes from the same
tradition as leaders like Moses, David, and Solomon, who used
religious reasons to justify their movements on behalf of their
people. Túpac Amaru mixed Christian and Incan religious elements to
justify his rebellion.
As a final note from our study of Túpac Amaru with Professor
Klaiber, anyone seriously studying Túpac Amaru has to be very
careful about their sources. Just like with the Incas, most of our
knowledge about Túpac Amaru comes from Spanish writers. Since they
were the people who killed him and then quartered his body, they tend
to have a bit of a bias. You always have to read between the lines
when reading accounts of conquest and colonization.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario